Digital Art and Meaning: Interactive Installations
The way he introduces the topic is very interesting as he reminds us of how the audience has always had an input in artwork before it is interactive. Earlier, the “meaning of an artwork” was also created as a dialogue between the work and the audience” and now the work itself is “created within such dialogue”. I feel like the way he phrased this sentence sets out the base for the reading and interactive art and interpretation of art in general.
I didn’t really get the connection he was making between the body being a commodity and interactive installation art, but I do know for a fact that the importance of the body has an impact on performance art. I disagree however with the next point about how interactive installation art represents ongoing visual exploitation because, at the end of the day, it is art. The fact that interactive art gives the audience the space to “(physical) self-discovery” is very astonishing, to me. Not only do they benefit from the artwork, but without them, there would have been no meaning. The interactivity also reminded me of a video I watched earlier that I hope to discuss in class titled “The Sensory Room: Helping Students With Autism Focus and Learn”.
The connection made between art and neighbors is significant to the idea as a whole. The difference is made on the spot and among other people/art, and therefore a connection is made and the interactions are of benefit to both parties. The overall message basically amplifies the importance of the interactor or the audience in interactive art, as without them the definition would not be the same.
Music as Mirror of Mind
Firstly, I had no idea that hierarchy was a thing for music, and so my interest significantly increased as soon as I started reading, to learn more about what she is talking about. The concept of a sequence is also vital to what we are currently doing with tidal cycles. As she says, sometimes an individual sound is “awesome” and nothing else is needed to increase the effect. This is something that I noticed when I was working on my first assignment as sometimes adding more sounds was often disturbing and noisy rather than aesthetically pleasing.
As I read more about the concept of hierarchy, I started to grasp the gravity of it. Not only is it effective to deal with “the simultaneity of multiple, multidimensional and multipart sonic streams”, but it also solves many problems. The next part uses musical terminology that I am unfamiliar with so it impacted my understanding. Another aspect she brings up is the ear and how it listens to music. I don’t know if I understood it correctly, but either way, something may sound musical or pleasing to someone and annoying to someone, and so people liking or disliking music is not necessarily associated with the music itself, but also with the preference of the listener.
She discusses another aspect that I also thought about as I was working on the first tidal cycles assignment, the idea of how the music we listen to now is not organized along hierarchical lines, but rather on the layering of different elements. Being just a listener, in general, is what I incorporated into my assignment, unintentionally even, because this is the music that I am used to hearing. Music and tastes of people in music have changed a lot throughout the past 60 years if not more, not just the sounds and the technology integrated, but also the structure and the dismissal of the concept of the “note” which has started to occur recently. This is all based on the year 1999, so imagine how drastic the difference is today. Not only that, but there is also the emergence of visual representation.
Overall, I was not able to understand the whole text but I was able to somewhat break it down and try to understand the most out of it. It increased my understanding of music and the fact that it is not easy and just like everything else, it has changed dramatically with time.